4.8 Article

The CHR site: definition and genome-wide identification of a cell cycle transcriptional element

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 16, Pages 10331-10350

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku696

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) through Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research [IZKF] at the University of Leipzig [D02]
  2. John Templeton Foundation [24332]
  3. Freistaat Sachsen
  4. European Social Fund
  5. Oxford University Press
  6. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  7. University of Leipzig

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) has been identified as a DNA element with an important role in transcriptional regulation of late cell cycle genes. It has been shown that such genes are controlled by DREAM, MMB and FOXM1-MuvB and that these protein complexes can contact DNA via CHR sites. However, it has not been elucidated which sequence variations of the canonical CHR are functional and how frequent CHR-based regulation is utilized in mammalian genomes. Here, we define the spectrum of functional CHR elements. As the basis for a computational meta-analysis, we identify new CHR sequences and compile phylogenetic motif conservation as well as genome-wide protein-DNA binding and gene expression data. We identify CHR elements in most late cell cycle genes binding DREAM, MMB, or FOXM1-MuvB. In contrast, Myband forkhead-binding sites are underrepresented in both early and late cell cycle genes. Our findings support a general mechanism: sequential binding of DREAM, MMB and FOXM1-MuvB complexes to late cell cycle genes requires CHR elements. Taken together, we define the group of CHR-regulated genes in mammalian genomes and provide evidence that the CHR is the central promoter element in transcriptional regulation of late cell cycle genes by DREAM, MMB and FOXM1-MuvB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available