4.8 Article

CRISPR RNA binding and DNA target recognition by purified Cascade complexes from Escherichia coli

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 530-543

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1285

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Government of Canada through Genome Canada
  2. Ontario Research Fund [ORF-GL2-01-004]
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada [386681-2010]
  4. National Institutes of Health [GM10407]
  5. Russian Science Foundation
  6. NSERC [386681-2010]
  7. Ontario Genomics Institute [2009-OGI-ABC-1405]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and their associated Cas proteins comprise a prokaryotic RNA-guided adaptive immune system that interferes with mobile genetic elements, such as plasmids and phages. The type I-E CRISPR interference complex Cascade from Escherichia coli is composed of five different Cas proteins and a 61-nt-long guide RNA (crRNA). crRNAs contain a unique 32-nt spacer flanked by a repeat-derived 5' handle (8 nt) and a 3' handle (21 nt). The spacer part of crRNA directs Cascade to DNA targets. Here, we show that the Escherichia coli Cascade can be expressed and purified from cells lacking crRNAs and loaded in vitro with synthetic crRNAs, which direct it to targets complementary to crRNA spacer. The deletion of even one nucleotide from the crRNA 5' handle disrupted its binding to Cascade and target DNA recognition. In contrast, crRNA variants with just a single nucleotide downstream of the spacer part bound Cascade and the resulting ribonucleotide complex containing a 41-nt-long crRNA specifically recognized DNA targets. Thus, the Escherichia coli Cascade-crRNA system exhibits significant flexibility suggesting that this complex can be engineered for applications in genome editing and opening the way for incorporation of site-specific labels in crRNA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available