4.8 Article

Androgen receptor uses relaxed response element stringency for selective chromatin binding and transcriptional regulation in vivo

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 7, Pages 4230-4240

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1401

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Finnish Cancer Foundations
  4. Biocentrum Helsinki
  5. Helsinki University Central Hospital
  6. Helsinki Biomedical Graduate Program
  7. KU Leuven [OT/11/081]
  8. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The DNA-binding domains (DBDs) of class I steroid receptors-androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors-recognize a similar cis-element, an inverted repeat of 5'-AGAACA-3' with a 3-nt spacer. However, these receptors regulate transcription programs that are largely receptor-specific. To address the role of the DBD in and of itself in ensuring specificity of androgen receptor (AR) binding to chromatin in vivo, we used SPARKI knock-in mice whose AR DBD has the second zinc finger replaced by that of the glucocorticoid receptor. Comparison of AR-binding events in epididymides and prostates of wild-type (wt) and SPARKI mice revealed that AR achieves selective chromatin binding through a less stringent sequence requirement for the 3'-hexamer. In particular, a T at position 12 in the second hexamer is dispensable for wt AR but mandatory for SPARKI AR binding, and only a G at position 11 is highly conserved among wt AR-preferred response elements. Genome-wide AR-binding events agree with the respective transcriptome profiles, in that attenuated AR binding in SPARKI mouse epididymis correlates with blunted androgen response in vivo. Collectively, AR-selective actions in vivo rely on relaxed rather than increased stringency of cis-elements on chromatin. These elements are, in turn, poorly recognized by other class I steroid receptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available