4.8 Article

Genome-wide characterization reveals complex interplay between TP53 and TP63 in response to genotoxic stress

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages 6270-6285

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku299

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) [G0700754, G1001692]
  2. Breakthrough Breast Cancer
  3. MRC grant
  4. MRC [G0700754, G1001692] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Cancer Research UK [14276] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G1001692, G0700754] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Public Health Agency [EAT/4367/10] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In response to genotoxic stress the TP53 tumour suppressor activates target gene expression to induce cell cycle arrest or apoptosis depending on the extent of DNA damage. These canonical activities can be repressed by TP63 in normal stratifying epithelia to maintain proliferative capacity or drive proliferation of squamous cell carcinomas, where TP63 is frequently overexpressed/amplified. Here we use ChIP-sequencing, integrated with microarray analysis, to define the genome-wide interplay between TP53 and TP63 in response to genotoxic stress in normal cells. We reveal that TP53 and TP63 bind to overlapping, but distinct cistromes of sites through utilization of distinctive consensus motifs and that TP53 is constitutively bound to a number of sites. We demonstrate that cisplatin and adriamycin elicit distinct effects on TP53 and TP63 binding events, through which TP53 can induce or repress transcription of an extensive network of genes by direct binding and/or modulation of TP63 activity. Collectively, this results in a global TP53-dependent repression of cell cycle progression, mitosis and DNA damage repair concomitant with activation of anti-proliferative and proapoptotic canonical target genes. Further analyses reveal that in the absence of genotoxic stress TP63 plays an important role in maintaining expression of DNA repair genes, loss of which results in defective repair.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available