4.8 Article

The Catalytic Site Atlas 2.0: cataloging catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue D1, Pages D485-D489

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1243

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [081989/Z/07/A]
  2. European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
  3. US Department of Energy as part of the Midwest Center for Structural Genomics (MCSG) [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding which are the catalytic residues in an enzyme and what function they perform is crucial to many biology studies, particularly those leading to new therapeutics and enzyme design. The original version of the Catalytic Site Atlas (CSA) (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/databases/CSA) published in 2004, which catalogs the residues involved in enzyme catalysis in experimentally determined protein structures, had only 177 curated entries and employed a simplistic approach to expanding these annotations to homologous enzyme structures. Here we present a new version of the CSA (CSA 2.0), which greatly expands the number of both curated (968) and automatically annotated catalytic sites in enzyme structures, utilizing a new method for annotation transfer. The curated entries are used, along with the variation in residue type from the sequence comparison, to generate 3D templates of the catalytic sites, which in turn can be used to find catalytic sites in new structures. To ease the transfer of CSA annotations to other resources a new ontology has been developed: the Enzyme Mechanism Ontology, which has permitted the transfer of annotations to Mechanism, Annotation and Classification in Enzymes (MACiE) and UniProt Knowledge Base (UniProtKB) resources. The CSA database schema has been re-designed and both the CSA data and search capabilities are presented in a new modern web interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available