4.8 Article

Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 15, Pages 7429-7437

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt520

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Harvey L. Karp Discovery Award
  2. Bettencourt Schuller Foundation
  3. Helmsley Postdoctoral Fellowship for Basic and Translational Research on Disorders of the Digestive System at The Rockefeller University
  4. NIH [R01 GM044025]
  5. NIH Director's Pioneer Award [DP1MH100706]
  6. Transformative R01 Foundation
  7. Keck Foundation
  8. McKnight Foundation
  9. Gates Foundation
  10. Damon Runyon Foundation
  11. Searle Scholars Foundation
  12. Klingenstein Foundation
  13. Simons Foundation
  14. Searle Scholars Program
  15. Rita Allen Scholars Program
  16. Irma T. Hirschl Award
  17. NIH Director's New Innovator Award [1DP2AI104556-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability to artificially control transcription is essential both to the study of gene function and to the construction of synthetic gene networks with desired properties. Cas9 is an RNA-guided double-stranded DNA nuclease that participates in the CRISPR-Cas immune defense against prokaryotic viruses. We describe the use of a Cas9 nuclease mutant that retains DNA-binding activity and can be engineered as a programmable transcription repressor by preventing the binding of the RNA polymerase (RNAP) to promoter sequences or as a transcription terminator by blocking the running RNAP. In addition, a fusion between the omega subunit of the RNAP and a Cas9 nuclease mutant directed to bind upstream promoter regions can achieve programmable transcription activation. The simple and efficient modulation of gene expression achieved by this technology is a useful asset for the study of gene networks and for the development of synthetic biology and biotechnological applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available