4.8 Article

The SMC1-SMC3 cohesin heterodimer structures DNA through supercoiling-dependent loop formation

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 12, Pages 6149-6160

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt303

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [MCB-1022117, DMR-1206868]
  2. NIH-NCI [U54CA143869-01]
  3. Chicago Biomedical Consortium
  4. Searle Funds at The Chicago Community Trust
  5. American Heart Association
  6. International Human Frontier Science Program grant
  7. MEXT
  8. NIH [U54CA14869-01]
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1022117] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Division Of Materials Research
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1206868] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cohesin plays a critical role in sister chromatid cohesion, double-stranded DNA break repair and regulation of gene expression. However, the mechanism of how cohesin directly interacts with DNA remains unclear. We report single-molecule experiments analyzing the interaction of the budding yeast cohesin Structural Maintenance of Chromosome (SMC)1-SMC3 heterodimer with naked double-helix DNA. The cohesin heterodimer is able to compact DNA molecules against applied forces of 0.45 pN, via a series of extension steps of a well-defined size approximate to 130 nm. This reaction does not require ATP, but is dependent on DNA supercoiling: DNA with positive torsional stress is compacted more quickly than negatively supercoiled or nicked DNAs. Un-nicked torsionally relaxed DNA is a poor substrate for the compaction reaction. Experiments with mutant proteins indicate that the dimerization hinge region is crucial to the folding reaction. We conclude that the SMC1-SMC3 heterodimer is able to restructure the DNA double helix into a series of loops, with a preference for positive writhe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available