4.8 Article

Bioinformatic analysis reveals an evolutional selection for DNA: RNA hybrid G-quadruplex structures as putative transcription regulatory elements in warm-blooded animals

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 22, Pages 10379-10390

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt781

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB530802, 2012CB720601, 2010CB945300]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [30970617, 21072189]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, we reported the co-transcriptional formation of DNA: RNA hybrid G-quadruplex (HQ) structure by the non-template DNA strand and nascent RNA transcript, which in turn modulates transcription under both in vitro and in vivo conditions. Here we present bioinformatic analysis on putative HQ-forming sequences (PHQS) in the genomes of eukaryotic organisms. Starting from amphibian, PHQS motifs are concentrated in the immediate 1000-nt region downstream of transcription start sites, implying their potential role in transcription regulation. Moreover, their occurrence shows a strong bias toward the non-template versus the template strand. PHQS has become constitutional in genes in warm-blooded animals, and the magnitude of the strand bias correlates with the ability of PHQS to form HQ, suggesting a selection based on HQ formation. This strand bias is reversed in lower species, implying that the selection of PHQS/HQ depended on the living temperature of the organisms. In comparison with the putative intramolecular G-quadruplex-forming sequences (PQS), PHQS motifs are far more prevalent and abundant in the transcribed regions, making them the dominant candidates in the formation of G-quadruplexes in transcription. Collectively, these results suggest that the HQ structures are evolutionally selected to function in transcription and other transcription-mediated processes that involve guanine-rich non-template strand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available