4.8 Article

Protein Ontology: a controlled structured network of protein entities

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue D1, Pages D415-D421

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1173

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [5R01GM080646-08]
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI-1062520]
  3. National Instititutes for Allergy and Infectious Diseases [HHSN272201200028C]
  4. NIH [5R01GM080646-08]
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA034196] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM080646] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1062520] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Protein Ontology (PRO; http://proconsortium.org) formally defines protein entities and explicitly represents their major forms and interrelations. Protein entities represented in PRO corresponding to single amino acid chains are categorized by level of specificity into family, gene, sequence and modification metaclasses, and there is a separate metaclass for protein complexes. All metaclasses also have organism-specific derivatives. PRO complements established sequence databases such as UniProtKB, and interoperates with other biomedical and biological ontologies such as the Gene Ontology (GO). PRO relates to UniProtKB in that PRO's organism-specific classes of proteins encoded by a specific gene correspond to entities documented in UniProtKB entries. PRO relates to the GO in that PRO's representations of organism-specific protein complexes are subclasses of the organism-agnostic protein complex terms in the GO Cellular Component Ontology. The past few years have seen growth and changes to the PRO, as well as new points of access to the data and new applications of PRO in immunology and proteomics. Here we describe some of these developments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available