4.8 Article

Canonical correlation analysis for RNA-seq co-expression networks

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt145

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. NHLBI [1R01AR057120-01, 1R01HL106034-01]
  4. National Basic Research Program [2012CB944600]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology [2011BAI09B00, 2007AA02Z312]
  6. Ministry of Health [201002007]
  7. National Science Foundation of China [30890034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Digital transcriptome analysis by next-generation sequencing discovers substantial mRNA variants. Variation in gene expression underlies many biological processes and holds a key to unravelling mechanism of common diseases. However, the current methods for construction of co-expression networks using overall gene expression are originally designed for microarray expression data, and they overlook a large number of variations in gene expressions. To use information on exon, genomic positional level and allele-specific expressions, we develop novel component-based methods, single and bivariate canonical correlation analysis, for construction of co-expression networks with RNA-seq data. To evaluate the performance of our methods for co-expression network inference with RNA-seq data, they are applied to lung squamous cell cancer expression data from TCGA database and our bipolar disorder and schizophrenia RNA-seq study. The preliminary results demonstrate that the co-expression networks constructed by canonical correlation analysis and RNA-seq data provide rich genetic and molecular information to gain insight into biological processes and disease mechanism. Our new methods substantially outperform the current statistical methods for co-expression network construction with microarray expression data or RNA-seq data based on overall gene expression levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available