4.8 Article

ArchDB 2014: structural classification of loops in proteins

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue D1, Pages D315-D319

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1189

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [FEDER BIO2008-0205, FEDER BIO2011-22568, EUI2009-04018]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/W/10962A01D] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/W/10962A01D] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The function of a protein is determined by its three-dimensional structure, which is formed by regular (i.e. beta-strands and alpha-helices) and non-periodic structural units such as loops. Compared to regular structural elements, non-periodic, non-repetitive conformational units enclose a much higher degree of variability-raising difficulties in the identification of regularities, and yet represent an important part of the structure of a protein. Indeed, loops often play a pivotal role in the function of a protein and different aspects of protein folding and dynamics. Therefore, the structural classification of protein loops is an important subject with clear applications in homology modelling, protein structure prediction, protein design (e.g. enzyme design and catalytic loops) and function prediction. ArchDB, the database presented here (freely available at http://sbi.imim.es/archdb), represents such a resource and has been an important asset for the scientific community throughout the years. In this article, we present a completely reworked and updated version of ArchDB. The new version of ArchDB features a novel, fast and user-friendly web-based interface, and a novel graph-based, computationally efficient, clustering algorithm. The current version of ArchDB classifies 149,134 loops in 5739 classes and 9608 subclasses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available