4.8 Article

Hundreds of conserved non-coding genomic regions are independently lost in mammals

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 22, Pages 11463-11476

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks905

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [Hi 1423/2-1]
  2. Human Frontier Science Program [LT000896/2009-L]
  3. NIH [R01HD059862, R01HG005058]
  4. NSF Center for Science of Information (CSoI) [CCF-0939370]
  5. Packard Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conserved non-protein-coding DNA elements (CNEs) often encode cis-regulatory elements and are rarely lost during evolution. However, CNE losses that do occur can be associated with phenotypic changes, exemplified by pelvic spine loss in sticklebacks. Using a computational strategy to detect complete loss of CNEs in mammalian genomes while strictly controlling for artifacts, we find >600 CNEs that are independently lost in at least two mammalian lineages, including a spinal cord enhancer near GDF11. We observed several genomic regions where multiple independent CNE loss events happened; the most extreme is the DIAPH2 locus. We show that CNE losses often involve deletions and that CNE loss frequencies are non-uniform. Similar to less pleiotropic enhancers, we find that independently lost CNEs are shorter, slightly less constrained and evolutionarily younger than CNEs without detected losses. This suggests that independently lost CNEs are less pleiotropic and that pleiotropic constraints contribute to non-uniform CNE loss frequencies. We also detected 35 CNEs that are independently lost in the human lineage and in other mammals. Our study uncovers an interesting aspect of the evolution of functional DNA in mammalian genomes. Experiments are necessary to test if these independently lost CNEs are associated with parallel phenotype changes in mammals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available