4.8 Article

Identification and characterization of the RNA binding surface of the pentatricopeptide repeat protein

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 2712-2723

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr1084

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  2. Kyushu University
  3. Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [22681028, 22380008]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22380008, 23657003, 22681028] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The expressions of chloroplast and mitochondria genes are tightly controlled by numerous nuclear-encoded proteins, mainly at the post-transcriptional level. Recent analyses have identified a large, plant-specific family of pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) motif-containing proteins that are exclusively involved in RNA metabolism of organelle genes via sequence-specific RNA binding. A tandem array of PPR motifs within the protein is believed to facilitate the RNA interaction, although little is known of the mechanism. Here, we describe the RNA interacting framework of a PPR protein, Arabidopsis HCF152. First, we demonstrated that a Pfam model could be relevant to the PPR motif function. A series of proteins with two PPR motifs showed significant differences in their RNA binding affinities, indicating functional differences among PPR motifs. Mutagenesis and informatics analysis putatively identified five amino acids organizing its RNA binding surface [the 1st, 4th, 8th, 12th and 'ii'(-2nd) amino acids] and their complex connections. SELEX (Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment) and nucleobase preference assays determined the nucleobases with high affinity for HCF152 and suggested several characteristic amino acids that may be involved in determining specificity and/or affinity of the PPR/RNA interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available