4.8 Article

Prediction of leucine-rich nuclear export signal containing proteins with NESsential

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr493

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Interchange association Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. research institute (AIST, Computational Biology Research Center, Tokyo, Japan)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [10J08344] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classical nuclear export signal (NES), also known as the leucine-rich NES, is a protein localization signal often involved in important processes such as signal transduction and cell cycle regulation. Although 15 years has passed since its discovery, limited structural information and high sequence diversity have hampered understanding of the NES. Several consensus sequences have been proposed to describe it, but they suffer from poor predictive power. On the other hand, the NetNES server provides the only computational method currently available. Although these two methods have been widely used to attempt to find the correct NES position within potential NES-containing proteins, their performance has not yet been evaluated on the basic task of identifying NES-containing proteins. We propose a new predictor, NESsential, which uses sequence derived meta-features, such as predicted disorder and solvent accessibility, in addition to primary sequence. We demonstrate that it can identify promising NES-containing candidate proteins (albeit at low coverage), but other methods cannot. We also quantitatively demonstrate that predicted disorder is a useful feature for prediction and investigate the different features of (predicted) ordered versus disordered NES's. Finally, we list 70 recently discovered NES-containing proteins, doubling the number available to the community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available