4.8 Article

Stability of telomeric G-quadruplexes

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages 3282-3294

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq1292

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN)
  4. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  5. University of Bordeaux 2
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [G4-Toolbox ANR-09-BLAN-0355]
  7. Region Aquitaine grants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In most eukaryotes, telomeric DNA consists of repeats of a short motif that includes consecutive guanines and may hence fold into G-quadruplexes. Budding yeasts have telomeres composed of longer repeats and show variation in the degree of repeat homogeneity. Although telomeric sequences from several organisms have been shown to fold into G-quadruplexes in vitro, surprisingly, no study has been dedicated to the comparison of G-quadruplex folding and stability of known telomeric sequences. Furthermore, to our knowledge, folding of yeast telomeric sequences into intramolecular G-quadruplexes has never been investigated. Using biophysical and biochemical methods, we studied sequences mimicking about four repetitions of telomeric motifs from a variety of organisms, including yeasts, with the aim of comparing the G-quadruplex folding potential of telomeric sequences among eukaryotes. G-quadruplex folding did not appear to be a conserved feature among yeast telomeric sequences. By contrast, all known telomeric sequences from eukaryotes other than yeasts folded into G-quadruplexes. Nevertheless, while G(3)T(1-4)A repeats (found in a variety of organisms) and G(4)T(2,4) repeats (found in ciliates) folded into stable G-quadruplexes, G-quadruplexes formed by repetitions of G(2)T(2)A and G(2)CT(2)A motifs (found in many insects and in nematodes, respectively) appeared to be in equilibrium with non-G-quadruplex structures (likely hairpin-duplexes).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available