4.8 Article

A high throughput experimental approach to identify miRNA targets in human cells

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp715

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ubbo Emmius Foundation, University Medical Center Groningen
  2. Dutch Cancer Society [2006-3643]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [NWO] [VIDI 971-36-400]
  4. Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of human microRNAs is seriously hampered by the lack of proper tools allowing genome-wide identification of miRNA targets. We performed Ribonucleoprotein ImmunoPrecipitation-gene Chip (RIP-Chip) using antibodies against wild-type human Ago2 in untreated Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) cell lines. Ten to thirty percent of the gene transcripts from the genome were enriched in the Ago2-IP fraction of untreated cells, representing the HL miRNA-targetome. In silico analysis indicated that similar to 40% of these gene transcripts represent targets of the abundantly co-expressed miRNAs. To identify targets of miR-17/20/93/106, RIP-Chip with anti-miR-17/20/93/106 treated cells was performed and 1189 gene transcripts were identified. These genes were analyzed for miR-17/20/93/106 target sites in the 5'-UTRs, coding regions and 3'-UTRs. Fifty-one percent of them had miR-17/20/93/106 target sites in the 3'-UTR while 19% of them were predicted miR-17/20/93/106 targets by TargetScan. Luciferase reporter assay confirmed targeting of miR-17/20/93/106 to the 3'-UTRs of 8 out of 10 genes. In conclusion, we report a method which can establish the miRNA-targetome in untreated human cells and identify miRNA specific targets in a high throughput manner. This approach is applicable to identify miRNA targets in any human tissue sample or purified cell population in an unbiased and physiologically relevant manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available