4.8 Article

Systematic identification and characterization of chicken (Gallus gallus) ncRNAs

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 19, Pages 6562-6574

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp704

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB94 6903, 2007CB946901, 2005CB522405, 2005CB522505, 2009CB941602, 2009CB825403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30721063, 30871248]
  3. Chinese National Programs for High Technology Research and Development [2006AA10A121, 2007AA02 Z109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have demonstrated that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) play important roles during development and evolution. Chicken, the first genome-sequenced non-mammalian amniote, possesses unique features for developmental and evolutionary studies. However, apart from microRNAs, information on chicken ncRNAs has mainly been obtained from computational predictions without experimental validation. In the present study, we performed a systematic identification of intermediate size ncRNAs (50-500 nt) by ncRNA library construction and identified 125 chicken ncRNAs. Importantly, through the bioinformatics and expression analysis, we found the chicken ncRNAs has several novel features: (i) comparative genomic analysis against 18 sequenced vertebrate genomes revealed that the majority of the newly identified ncRNA candidates is not conserved and most are potentially bird/chicken specific, suggesting that ncRNAs play roles in lineage/species specification during evolution. (ii) The expression pattern analysis of intronic snoRNAs and their host genes suggested the coordinated expression between snoRNAs and their host genes. (iii) Several spatio-temporal specific expression patterns suggest involvement of ncRNAs in tissue development. Together, these findings provide new clues for future functional study of ncRNAs during development and evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available