4.8 Article

A short motif in Drosophila SECIS Binding Protein 2 provides differential binding affinity to SECIS RNA hairpins

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 2126-2141

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp078

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Action Concertee Incitative [BCMS 226]
  2. Programme InterOrganismes
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education [BIO2006-03380]
  4. Biosapiens [LSHG-CT-2003-503265]
  5. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [08-04-00508]
  6. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  7. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science
  8. EMBO short-term fellowship [AST F91-2007]
  9. CNRS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selenoproteins contain the amino acid selenocysteine which is encoded by a UGA Sec codon. Recoding UGA Sec requires a complex mechanism, comprising the cis-acting SECIS RNA hairpin in the 3UTR of selenoprotein mRNAs, and trans-acting factors. Among these, the SECIS Binding Protein 2 (SBP2) is central to the mechanism. SBP2 has been so far functionally characterized only in rats and humans. In this work, we report the characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster SBP2 (dSBP2). Despite its shorter length, it retained the same selenoprotein synthesis-promoting capabilities as the mammalian counterpart. However, a major difference resides in the SECIS recognition pattern: while human SBP2 (hSBP2) binds the distinct form 1 and 2 SECIS RNAs with similar affinities, dSBP2 exhibits high affinity toward form 2 only. In addition, we report the identification of a K (lysine)-rich domain in all SBP2s, essential for SECIS and 60S ribosomal subunit binding, differing from the well-characterized L7Ae RNA-binding domain. Swapping only five amino acids between dSBP2 and hSBP2 in the K-rich domain conferred reversed SECIS-binding properties to the proteins, thus unveiling an important sequence for form 1 binding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available