4.8 Article

A hierarchical Bayesian model for comparing transcriptomes at the individual transcript isoform level

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp282

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [P50 HG 002790] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [P50HG002790] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The complexity of mammalian transcriptomes is compounded by alternative splicing which allows one gene to produce multiple transcript isoforms. However, transcriptome comparison has been limited to differential analysis at the gene level instead of the individual transcript isoform level. High-throughput sequencing technologies and high-resolution tiling arrays provide an unprecedented opportunity to compare transcriptomes at the level of individual splice variants. However, sequence read coverage or probe intensity at each position may represent a family of splice variants instead of one single isoform. Here we propose a hierarchical Bayesian model, BASIS (Bayesian Analysis of Splicing IsoformS), to infer the differential expression level of each transcript isoform in response to two conditions. A latent variable was introduced to perform direct statistical selection of differentially expressed isoforms. Model parameters were inferred based on an ergodic Markov chain generated by our Gibbs sampler. BASIS has the ability to borrow information across different probes (or positions) from the same genes and different genes. BASIS can handle the heteroskedasticity of probe intensity or sequence read coverage. We applied BASIS to a human tiling-array data set and a mouse RNA-seq data set. Some of the predictions were validated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available