4.8 Article

Influence of substituent modifications on the binding of 2-amino-1,8-naphthyridines to cytosine opposite an AP site in DNA duplexes: thermodynamic characterization

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 1411-1422

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn1079

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Scientific Research (A) [17205009]
  2. Scientific Research (B) [20350032]
  3. Exploratory Research [19655022]
  4. G-COE Project
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19655022, 20350032] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, we report on a significant effect of substitutions on the binding affinity of a series of 2-amino-1,8-naphthyridines, i.e., 2-amino-1,8-naphthyridine (AND), 2-amino-7-methyl-1,8-naphthyridine (AMND), 2-amino-5,7-dimethyl-1,8-naphthyridine (ADMND) and 2-amino-5,6,7-trimethyl-1,8-naphthyridine (ATMND), all of which can bind to cytosine opposite an AP site in DNA duplexes. Fluorescence titration experiments show that the binding affinity for cytosine is effectively enhanced by the introduction of methyl groups to the naphthyridine ring, and the 1:1 binding constant (10(6) M-1) follows in the order of AND (0.30) AMND (2.7) ADMND (6.1) ATMND (19) in solutions containing 110 mM Na (pH 7.0, at 20C). The thermodynamic parameters obtained by isothermal titration calorimetry experiments indicate that the introduction of methyl groups effectively reduces the loss of binding entropy, which is indeed responsible for the increase in the binding affinity. The heat capacity change (C-p), as determined from temperature dependence of the binding enthalpy, is found to be significantly different between AND (161 cal/mol K) and ATMND (217 cal/mol K). The hydrophobic contribution appears to be a key force to explain the observed effect of substitutions on the binding affinity when the observed binding free energy (G(obs)) is dissected into its component terms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available