4.8 Article

Identification of the Rem-responsive element of mouse mammary tumor virus

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 19, Pages 6284-6294

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn608

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Christian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft
  2. Der Wissenschaftsfonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF) [P20201-B03]
  3. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Gene Therapeutic Vector Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) has previously been shown to encode a functional homolog of the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) nuclear export protein Rev, termed Rem. Here, we show that deletion of the rem gene from a MMTV molecular clone interfered with the nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of genomic length viral mRNA and resulted in a loss of viral capsid (Gag) protein production. Interestingly, nuclear export of single-spliced env mRNA was only moderately affected, suggesting that this transcript is, at least to some extent, transported via a distinct, Rem-independent export mechanism. To identify and characterize a cis-acting RNA element required for Rem responsiveness (RmRE), extensive computational and functional analyses were performed. By these means a region of 490 nt corresponding to positions nt 8517nt 9006 in the MMTV reference strain was identified as RmRE. Deletion of this fragment, which spans the env-U3 junction region, abolished Gag expression. Furthermore, insertion of this sequence into a heterologous HIV-1-based reporter construct restored, in the presence of Rem, HIV-1 Gag expression to levels determined for the Rev/RRE export system. These results clearly demonstrate that the identified region, whose geometry resembles that of other retroviral-responsive elements, is capable to functionally substitute, in the presence of Rem, for Rev/RRE and thus provide unequivocal evidence that MMTV is a complex retrovirus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available