4.8 Article

Structural explanation for the role of Mn2+ in the activity of φ6 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 20, Pages 6633-6644

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn632

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Finnish Centre of Excellence Program [2006-2011]
  2. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0320/2001-M]
  3. SPINE2-COMPLEXES [LSHG-CT-2006-031220]
  4. Helsinki Graduate School in Biotechnology and Molecular Biology
  5. Kuopio Naturalists' Society
  6. Royal Society
  7. Medical Research Council, UK
  8. Academy of Finland
  9. [1213992]
  10. [1213467]
  11. Medical Research Council [G0500365] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. MRC [G0500365] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biological role of manganese (Mn2+) has been a long-standing puzzle, since at low concentrations it activates several polymerases whilst at higher concentrations it inhibits. Viral RNA polymerases possess a common architecture, reminiscent of a closed right hand. The RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of bacteriophage phi 6 is one of the best understood examples of this important class of polymerases. We have probed the role of Mn2+ by biochemical, biophysical and structural analyses of the wild-type enzyme and of a mutant form with an altered Mn2+-binding site (E491 to Q). The E491Q mutant has much reduced affinity for Mn2+, reduced RNA binding and a compromised elongation rate. Loss of Mn2+ binding structurally stabilizes the enzyme. These data and a re-examination of the structures of other viral RNA polymerases clarify the role of manganese in the activation of polymerization: Mn2+ coordination of a catalytic aspartate is necessary to allow the active site to properly engage with the triphosphates of the incoming NTPs. The structural flexibility caused by Mn2+ is also important for the enzyme dynamics, explaining the requirement for manganese throughout RNA polymerization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available