4.8 Article

Tissue-specific splicing factor gene expression signatures

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 15, Pages 4823-4832

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn463

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal [PTDC/SAU-GMG/69739/2006]
  2. European Commission [005499, LSHG-CT-2005-518238]
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/22825/2005]
  4. EURASNET
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-GMG/69739/2006, SFRH/BD/22825/2005] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The alternative splicing code that controls and coordinates the transcriptome in complex multicellular organisms remains poorly understood. It has long been argued that regulation of alternative splicing relies on combinatorial interactions between multiple proteins, and that tissue-specific splicing decisions most likely result from differences in the concentration and/or activity of these proteins. However, large-scale data to systematically address this issue have just recently started to become available. Here we show that splicing factor gene expression signatures can be identified that reflect cell type and tissue-specific patterns of alternative splicing. We used a computational approach to analyze microarray-based gene expression profiles of splicing factors from mouse, chimpanzee and human tissues. Our results show that brain and testis, the two tissues with highest levels of alternative splicing events, have the largest number of splicing factor genes that are most highly differentially expressed. We further identified SR protein kinases and small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) proteins among the splicing factor genes that are most highly differentially expressed in a particular tissue. These results indicate the power of generating signature-based predictions as an initial computational approach into a global view of tissue-specific alternative splicing regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available