4.8 Article

Frequency and fate of microRNA editing in human brain

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 16, Pages 5270-5280

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn479

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA72764, GM- 40536, GM079091, P30 CA10815, L070045]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [1-2006-210]
  3. Commonwealth Universal Research Enhancement Program, Pennsylvania Department of Health
  4. NCI [CA09171]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary transcripts of certain microRNA (miRNA) genes (pri-miRNAs) are subject to RNA editing that converts adenosine to inosine (A -> I RNA editing). However, the frequency of the pri-miRNA editing and the fate of edited pri-miRNAs remain largely to be determined. Examination of already known pri-miRNA editing sites indicated that adenosine residues of the U (A) under barG triplet sequence might be edited more frequently. In the present study, therefore, we conducted a large-scale survey of human pri-miRNAs containing the U (A) under barG triplet sequence. By direct sequencing of RTPCR products corresponding to pri-miRNAs, we examined 209 pri-miRNAs and identified 43 U (A) under barG and also 43 non-U (A) under barG editing sites in 47 pri-miRNAs, which were highly edited in human brain. In vitro miRNA processing assay using recombinant Drosha-DGCR8 and Dicer-TRBP (the human immuno deficiency virus transactivating response RNA-binding protein) complexes revealed that a majority of pri-miRNA editing is likely to interfere with the miRNA processing steps. In addition, four new edited miRNAs with altered seed sequences were identified by targeted cloning and sequencing of the miRNAs that would be processed from edited pri-miRNAs. Our studies predict that similar to 16% of human pri-miRNAs are subject to A -> I editing and, thus, miRNA editing could have a large impact on the miRNA-mediated gene silencing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available