4.3 Article

The classical Yang-Baxter equation and the associated Yangian symmetry of gauged WZW-type theories

Journal

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
Volume 889, Issue -, Pages 64-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.10.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ESF
  2. Greek National Funds through the Operational Program Education and Lifelong Learning of the NSRF - Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge in society through the European Social Fund
  3. European Social Fund (ESF)
  4. Actions de recherche concertees (ARC) de la Direction generale de l'Enseignement non obligatoire et de la Recherche scientifique - Direction de la Recherche scientifique - Communaute francaise de Belgique [AUWB-2010-10/15-UMONS-1]
  5. IISN-Belgium [convention 4.4511.06]
  6. EPSRC [EP/K014412/1]
  7. STFC [STFC-4070083442]
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K014412/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000490/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. EPSRC [EP/K014412/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. STFC [ST/L000490/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We construct the Lax-pair, the classical monodromy matrix and the corresponding solution of the Yang Baxter equation, for a two-parameter deformation of the Principal chiral model for a simple group. This deformation includes as a one-parameter subset, a class of integrable gauged WZW-type theories interpolating between the WZW model and the non-Abelian T-dual of the principal chiral model. We derive in full detail the Yangian algebra using two independent methods: by computing the algebra of the non-local charges and alternatively through an expansion of the Maillet brackets for the monodromy matrix. As a byproduct, we also provide a detailed general proof of the Serre relations for the Yangian symmetry. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available