4.3 Article

Non-supersymmetric infrared perturbations to the warped deformed conifold

Journal

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
Volume 842, Issue 3, Pages 383-413

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.09.008

Keywords

D-branes; Supergravity; Supersymmetry breaking

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Institute for Advanced Study, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  2. NSF [Phy-0348093]
  3. DOE [DE-FG-02-95ER40896]
  4. Research Corporation
  5. University of Wisconsin
  6. John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  7. Nishina Memorial Foundation
  8. Ambrose Monell Foundation
  9. Institute for Advanced Study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze properties of non-supersymmetric, isometry-preserving perturbations to the infrared region of the warped deformed conifold, i.e. the Klebanov-Strassler solution. We discuss both perturbations that squash the geometry, so that the internal space is no longer conformally Calabi-Yau, and perturbations that do not squash the geometry. Among the perturbations that we discuss is the solution that describes the linearized near-tip backreaction of a smeared collection of (D3) over bar -branes positioned in the deep infrared. Such a configuration is a candidate gravity dual of a non-supersymmetric state in a large-rank cascading gauge theory. Although (D3) over bar -branes do not directly couple to the 3-form flux, we argue that, due to the presence of the background imaginary self-dual flux, (D3) over bar -branes in the Klebanov-Strassler geometry necessarily produce singular non-imaginary self-dual flux. Moreover, since conformally Calabi-Yau geometries cannot be supported by non-imaginary self-dual flux, the (D3) over bar -branes squash the geometry as our explicit solution shows. We also briefly discuss supersymmetry-breaking perturbations at large radii and the effect of the non-supersymmetric perturbations on the gravitino mass. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available