4.3 Article

SU(2) chiral perturbation theory for Kl3 decay amplitudes

Journal

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
Volume 812, Issue 1-2, Pages 64-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.12.001

Keywords

Kaon physics; Weak decays; Chiral perturbation theory; Lattice QCD; Non-perturbative effects

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/DO0021 1/1]
  2. EU [MRTN-CT-2006-035482]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use one-loop SU(2)(L) x SU(2)(R) chiral perturbation theory (SU(2) ChPT) to study the behaviour of the form-factors for semileptonic K -> pi decays with the pion mass at q(2) = 0 and at q(max)(2) = (m(K) - m(pi))(2), where q is the momentum transfer. At q(2) = 0, the final-state pion has an energy of approximately m(K)/2 (for m(K) >> m(pi)) and so is not soft, nevertheless it is possible to compute the chiral logarithms, i.e. the corrections of O(m(pi)(2) log(m(pi)(2))). We envisage that our results at q(2) = 0 will be useful in extrapolating lattice QCD results to physical masses. A consequence of the Callan-Treiman relation is that in the SU(2) chiral limit (m(u) = m(d) = 0), the scalar form factor f(0) at q(max)(2) is equal to f ((K))/f, the ratio of the kaon and pion leptonic decay constants in the chiral limit. Lattice results for the scalar form factor at q(max)(2) are obtained with excellent precision, but at the masses at which the simulations are performed the results are about 25% below f((K))/f and are increasing only very slowly. We investigate the chiral behaviour of f(0)(q(max)(2)) and find large corrections which provide a semi-quantitative explanation of the difference between the lattice results and f((K))/f. We stress the generality of the relation f(p ->pi)(0)(q(max)(2)) = f((P))/f in the SU(2) chiral limit, where P = K, D or B and briefly comment on the potential value of using this theorem in obtaining physical results from lattice simulations. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available