4.2 Article

Dilepton radiation at the CERN super-proton synchrotron

Journal

NUCLEAR PHYSICS A
Volume 806, Issue -, Pages 339-387

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.03.009

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A quantitative evaluation of dilepton sources in heavy-ion reactions is performed taking into account both thermal and non-thermal production mechanisms. The hadronic thermal emission rate is based on an electromagnetic current-correlation function with a low-mass region (LMR, M less than or similar to 1 GeV) dominated by vector mesons (rho, omega, phi) and an intermediate-mass region (IMR, 1 GeV <= M <= 3 GeV) characterized by (the onset of) a multi-meson continuum. A convolution of the emission rates over a thermal fireball expansion results in good agreement with experiment in the low-mass spectra, confirming the predicted broadening of the p meson in hadronic matter in connection with the prevalence of baryon-induced medium effects. The absolute magnitude of the LMR excess is mostly controlled by the fireball lifetime, which in turn leads to a consistent explanation of the dilepton excess in the IMR in terms of thermal radiation. The analysis of experimental transverse-momentum (q(T)) spectra reveals discrepancies with thermal emission for q(T) greater than or similar to 1 GeV in non-central In-In collisions, which we address by extending our calculations by: (i) a refined treatment of p decays at thermal freeze-out, (ii) primordially produced p's subject to energy-loss, (iii) Drell-Yan annihilation, and (iv) thermal radiation from t-channel meson exchange processes. We investigate the sensitivity of dilepton spectra to the critical temperature and hadro-chemical freeze-out of the fireball. The p broadening in the LMR turns out to be robust, while in the IMR Quark-Gluon Plasma radiation is moderate unless the critical temperature is rather low. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available