Validation of new image-derived arterial input functions at the aorta using 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography

Objectives (i) To validate two new image-based methods for finding the plasma arterial input function (AIF) and evaluate the performance of these and two similar techniques against arterial sampling. (ii) To evaluate the performance of all four image-derived AIF (IDAIF) methods against arterial sampling for measuring the F-18 plasma clearance (K-i) to the lumbar spine. Methods Eight healthy postmenopausal women had a F-18-fluoride positron emission tomography scan of the lumbar spine. Venous blood samples were used to estimate the IDAIFs from: (i) a fixed population-based partial volume correction (PVC) factor method, (ii) a variable PVC factor method, (iii) the Chen method, and (iv) the Cook-Lodge method. Continuous arterial sampling and the respective K-i values were used as the gold standard against which the performance of the IDAIF methods was compared. Results The IDAIFs were compared with direct arterial sampling in terms of the area under the curve values. The percentage root mean square error in area under the curves compared with arterial sampling were: (i) fixed PVC: 12.7%, (ii) variable PVC: 12.0%, (iii) Chen: 39.0%, and (iv) Cook-Lodge: 17.3%. There were small but significant differences in the K-i values found by all four methods compared with arterial sampling. Bland-Altman plots of K-i values showed the best agreement for the variable and fixed PVC methods with a standard deviation of 0.0026 and 0.0030 ml/min/ml, respectively. Conclusion The differences in the K-i values obtained at the lumbar spine using direct arterial sampling and any of the IDAIF methods at the aorta were clinically nonsignificant. The variable PVC and fixed PVC methods performed better than the Cook-Lodge and Chen methods. Nucl Med Commun 32:486-495 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.