4.7 Article

Data-Based Models for the Prediction of Dam Behaviour: A Review and Some Methodological Considerations

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11831-015-9157-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, MINECO) through the project iComplex [IPT-2012-0813-390000]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, MINECO) through the project AIDA [BIA2013-49018-C2-1-R, BIA2013-49018-C2-2-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predictive models are an important element in dam safety analysis. They provide an estimate of the dam response faced with a given load combination, which can be compared with the actual measurements to draw conclusions about dam safety. In addition to numerical finite element models, statistical models based on monitoring data have been used for decades for this purpose. In particular, the hydrostatic-season-time method is fully implemented in engineering practice, although some limitations have been pointed out. In other fields of science, powerful tools such as neural networks and support vector machines have been developed, which make use of observed data for interpreting complex systems . This paper contains a review of statistical and machine-learning data-based predictive models, which have been applied to dam safety analysis . Some aspects to take into account when developing analysis of this kind, such as the selection of the input variables, its division into training and validation sets, and the error analysis, are discussed. Most of the papers reviewed deal with one specific output variable of a given dam typology and the majority also lack enough validation data. As a consequence, although results are promising, there is a need for further validation and assessment of generalisation capability. Future research should also focus on the development of criteria for data pre-processing and model application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available