4.3 Article

64Cu-Labeled CB-TE2A and diamsar-conjugated RGD peptide analogs for targeting angiogenesis: comparison of their biological activity

Journal

NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 277-285

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.12.008

Keywords

Copper-64; RGD; CB-TE2A; Diamsar

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R24 CA086307, P30 CA091842, R24 CA86060, R01 CA093375-08, P30 CA091842-080008, R01 CA093375, P30 CA91842, R24 CA086307-10, R24 CA86307] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The alpha(v)beta(3) integrin is a cell adhesion molecule known to be involved in stages of angiogenesis and metastasis. In this study,,4 the chelators CB-TE2A and diamsar were conjugated to cyclic RGDyK and RGDfD and the biological properties of Cu-64-labeled peptides were compared. Methods: CB-TE2A-c(RGDyK) and diamsar-c(RGDfD) were labeled with Cu-64 in 0.1 M NH4OAc (pH=8) at 95 degrees C and 25 degrees C, respectively. PET and biodistribution studies were carried out on M21 (alpha(v)beta(3)-positive) and M21L (alpha(v)-negative) melanoma-bearing mice. Binding affinity of the Cu-chelator-RGD peptides to alpha(v)beta(3) integrins was determined by a competitive binding affinity assay. Results: Biological studies showed higher concentration of Cu-64-CB-TE2A-c(RGDyK) in M21 tumor compared to M21L tumor at 1 and 4 h pi. Tumor concentration of Cu-64-CB-TE2A-c(RGDyK) was higher than that of Cu-64-diamsar-c(RGDfD). The difference is not due to differing binding affinities, since similar values were obtained for the agents. Compared to Cu-64-chiamsar-c(RGDfD), there is more rapid liver and blood clearance of Cu-64-CB-TE2A-c(RGDyK), resulting in a lower liver and blood concentration at 24 11 pi. Both Cu-64-labeled RGD peptides show similar binding affinities to alpha(v)beta(3). The differences in their biodistribution properties are likely related to different linkers, charges and lipophilicities. The M21 tumor is clearly visualized with Cu-64-CB-TE2A-c(RGDyK) by microPET imaging. Administration of c (RGDyK) as a block significantly reduced the tumor concentration; however, the radioactivity background was also decreased by the blocking dose. Conclusions: Both Cu-64-CB-TE2A-c(RGDyK) and Cu-64-diamsar-c(RGDfD) are potential candidates for imaging tumor angiogenesis. For diamsar-c(RGDfD), a linker may be needed between the Cu-chelator moiety and the RGD peptide to achieve optimal in vivo tumor concentration and clearance from nontarget organs. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available