4.4 Article

Dual-fission chamber and neutron beam characterization for fission product yield measurements using monoenergetic neutrons

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2014.03.022

Keywords

Fission product yields; Dual-fission chamber; Neutron production; Beam characterization

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy at Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory through NNSA
  2. Stewardship Science Academic Alliances Program [DE-FG52-09NA29465, DE-FG52-09NA29448, DE-NA0001839, DE-NA0001784]
  3. Los Alamos National Security, LLC [DE-AC52 06NA25396]
  4. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A program has been initiated to measure the energy dependence of selected high-yield fission products used in the analysis of nuclear test data. We present out initial work of neutron activation using a dual-fission chamber with quasi-monoenergetic neutrons and gamma-counting method. Quasi-monoenergetic neutrons of energies from 0.5 to 15 MeV using the TUNL 10 MV FM tandem to provide high-precision and self-consistent measurements of fission product yields (FPY). The final FPY results will be coupled with theoretical analysis to provide a more fundamental understanding of the fission process. To accomplish this goal, we have developed and tested a set of dual-fission ionization chambers to provide an accurate determination of the number of fissions occurring in a thick target located in the middle plane of the chamber assembly. Details of the fission chamber and its performance are presented along with neutron beam production and characterization. Also presented are studies on the background issues associated with room-return and off-energy neutron production. We show that the off-energy neutron contribution can be significant, but correctable, while room-return neutron background levels contribute less than < 1% to the fission signal. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available