4.4 Article

A metrology system for a high resolution cavity beam position monitor system

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2013.05.196

Keywords

Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM); Accelerator Test Facility (ATF); International Linear Collider (ILC)

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-03ER41279]
  2. Commission of the European Communities under the 6th Framework Programme Structuring the European Research Area [RIDS-011899]
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Japan-USA Collaborative Research
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001582/1, ST/J002011/1, ST/G008531/1, ST/J002038/1, John Adams Institute, ST/J002011/1 John Adams Inst] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24654076] Funding Source: KAKEN
  8. STFC [ST/J002038/1, ST/J002011/1, ST/G008531/1, John Adams Institute, ST/K001582/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

International Linear Collider (ILC) interaction region beam sizes and component position stability requirements will likely be as small as a few nanometers. It is important to the ILC design effort to demonstrate that these tolerances can be achieved-ideally using a beam-based stability measurement. We developed a high resolution RF cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) system. A triplet of these BPMs, installed in the extraction line of the KEK Accelerator Test Facility (ATF) and tested with its ultra-low emittance beam, achieved a position measurement resolution of 15 nm. A metrology system for the three BPMs was subsequently installed. This system employed optical encoders to measure each BPM's position and orientation relative to a zero-coefficient of thermal expansion carbon fiber frame. We have demonstrated that the three BPMs behave as a rigid-body at the level of less than 5 nm. (C) 2013 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available