4.6 Article

ASSESSMENT OF WIND CHARACTERISTICS AND ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION MODELING OF 137Cs ON THE BARAKAH NPP AREA IN THE UAE

Journal

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 557-568

Publisher

KOREAN NUCLEAR SOC
DOI: 10.5516/NET.09.2014.029

Keywords

Meteorological Modeling; Return Period; Atmospheric Dispersion; Cs-137 Dispersion; Barakah Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP); ERMS

Funding

  1. KUSTAR-KAIST Institute, Korea
  2. Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Radiation Safety Foundation (KORSAFe) [1305032-0113-SB110]
  3. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the results of an analysis of wind characteristics and atmosphere dispersion modeling that are based on computational simulation and part of a preliminary study evaluating environmental radiation monitoring system (ERMS) positions within the Barakah nuclear power plant (BNPP). The return period of extreme wind speed was estimated using the Weibull distribution over the life time of the BNPP. In the annual meteorological modeling, the winds from the north and west accounted for more than 90% of the wind directions. Seasonal effects were not represented. However, a discrepancy in the tendency between daytime and nighttime was observed. Six variations of cesium-137 (Cs-137) dispersion test were simulated under severe accident condition. The Cs-137 dispersion was strongly influenced by the direction and speed of the main wind. A virtual receptor was set and calculated for observation of the Cs-137 movement and accumulation. The results of the surface roughness effect demonstrated that the deposition of Cs-137 was affected by surface condition. The results of these studies offer useful information for developing environmental radiation monitoring systems (ERMSs) for the BNPP and can be used to assess the environmental effects of new nuclear power plant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available