4.6 Article

Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by microRNA-26a leading to growth inhibition of pancreatic cancer

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 158, Issue 4, Pages 981-986

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.019

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Michael and Marian Ilitch Research Fund, Department of Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine
  2. Detroit International Research and Education Foundation, Detroit, Michigan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. MicroRNA (miR)-26a has been identified as a tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer cells. Although wild-type p53 controls cell-cycle progression, its mutant form normally present in pancreatic cancer loses this capability. Phosphorylation is known to restore wild-type activity to mutant p53. We, therefore, examined whether miR-26a treatment can restore wild-type functions of mutant p53 via phosphorylation, resulting in inhibition of cell growth. Methods. The human pancreatic cancer cell line BxPc-3 harboring mutant p53 was used for colony formation, cell-cycle, and Western blotting assays. Gene profile analysis was conducted after transfection with pre-miR-26a. Results. miR-26a expression significantly decreased cell proliferation by 80% along with marked inhibition of colony formation and cell migration. Cell-cycle inhibition at the G(0)/G(1) interface was observed along with enhanced drug retention and increased chemosensitivity to gemcitabine. Mutant p53 was phosphorylated rapidly at its Ser9 and Ser392 residues, but not at Ser15 or Ser20. Gene profile analysis of pre-miR-26a-transfected cells showed a significant increase in gene transcripts promoting apoptosis and p53 activation, with decreased levels of genes involved in cell-cycle progression. Conclusion. Delivery of miR-26a may represent a novel strategy for inhibiting pancreatic cancer growth, at least in part by enhancing phosphorylation of mutant p53 to restore its wild-type functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available