4.0 Article

Use of Stable Isotopes and Otolith Micro-chemistry to Evaluate Migration in Male Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, from an Alaskan River

Journal

NORTHWEST SCIENCE
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 360-366

Publisher

NORTHWEST SCIENTIFIC ASSOC
DOI: 10.3955/046.088.0409

Keywords

anadromy; life history; male reproductive patterns; migration

Categories

Funding

  1. H. Mason Keeler Endowment at the University of Washington

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In salmonid fishes, males display much more variation in age and size at maturity than females, including a greater proportion of non-anadromous individuals, and those spending fewer years at sea than females. The life history of Chinook salmon is especially variable among Pacific salmon species, including non-anadromous (precocious parr) and early maturing anadromous males (jacks) but these have been studied primarily in populations towards the central and southern part of their range. In this study we investigated reports of small and putatively non-anadromous male Chinook salmon in Lake Creek, Alaska, using otolith microchemistry and stable isotopes. Small males (ca. 300-350 mm fork length) displayed otolith Sr:Ca ratios and delta N-15 values consistent with anadromy; indeed, the d15N values of these mini-jacks that had spent a year at sea and larger jacks (ca. 500 mm) were more enriched than those of the larger, older conspecifics. Thus the multiple alternative anadromous male life history patterns reported in southern populations (and often associated with rapid pre-smolt growth in hatcheries) are present in more northerly wild populations of Chinook salmon as well. Moreover, variation in stable isotopes indicated differences in marine distribution related to age (with younger fish closer to the coast), and otolith microchemistry suggested that some of the young males may have moved to low salinity water during their period of marine residence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available