4.1 Article

A Method for Monitoring Movements of Small Fishes in Urban Streams

Journal

NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 1444-1453

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1577/M08-248.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Colorado Division of Wildlife [IA-CSU-1180-2004]
  2. World Wildlife Fund
  3. Colorado State University Water Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Front Range region of Colorado is all ecological transition zone between the Rocky Mountains and the western Great Plains. Changes to streams resulting front urban and agricultural land uses have contributed to the decline of many plains and transition zone fishes. The fragmentation of stream systems by darns, weirs, and diversions is among,, the most detrimental of these changes. These structures call inhibit Fish spawning migrations. the search for sporadic resources, and recolonization of empty habitats. To assess the magnitude of the problem. there is a distinct need to determine whether existing instream structures are barriers to migration. A relatively simple method of doing so involves giving fish a unique mark and tracking their movements ill the vicinity of a suspected barrier. We individually marked fish (15 species; 2,724 individuals) With Visual implant elastomer (VIE) marks and tracked their movements across a grade control structure in Spring Creek in Fort Collins, Colorado. Results front a multistratum mark-recapture analysis showed that the grade control structure in Spring Creck prevented upstream movement by most fish. the approach we used identifies problematic instream structures that impede movements and present a potential stressor to fish assemblages in urban streams. The use of individual VIE marks is one of the few methods that can provide accurate information oil the movements of small-bodied fishes in streams. but the commonly encountered design issues associated with this type of study must be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available