4.5 Article

Physics constrained nonlinear regression models for time series

Journal

NONLINEARITY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 201-217

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/26/1/201

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMS-0456713]
  2. Office of Naval Research [DRI N00014-10-1-0554, N00014-11-1-0306]
  3. Office of Naval Research Grant [N00014-11-1-0310]
  4. NC State startup fund
  5. NC State Faculty Research and Professional Development fund
  6. Office of Naval Research Grant MURI [N00014-12-1-0912]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A central issue in contemporary science is the development of data driven statistical nonlinear dynamical models for time series of partial observations of nature or a complex physical model. It has been established recently that ad hoc quadratic multi-level regression (MLR) models can have finite-time blow up of statistical solutions and/or pathological behaviour of their invariant measure. Here a new class of physics constrained multi-level quadratic regression models are introduced, analysed and applied to build reduced stochastic models from data of nonlinear systems. These models have the advantages of incorporating memory effects in time as well as the nonlinear noise from energy conserving nonlinear interactions. The mathematical guidelines for the performance and behaviour of these physics constrained MLR models as well as filtering algorithms for their implementation are developed here. Data driven applications of these new multi-level nonlinear regression models are developed for test models involving a nonlinear oscillator with memory effects and the difficult test case of the truncated Burgers-Hopf model. These new physics constrained quadratic MLR models are proposed here as process models for Bayesian estimation through Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms of low frequency behaviour in complex physical data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available