4.7 Article

TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles film for cultural heritage: Conservation and consolidation of ceramic artifacts

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 271, Issue -, Pages 174-180

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.045

Keywords

Nanoparticles growth; Hydrophobicity; Ceramic coating

Funding

  1. European Project PON [042a_Comas]
  2. FRQNT/FRQSC [174726]
  3. CRSNG decouverte [435416]
  4. Regional Operative Program (ROP) Calabria ESF Axis Human Capital Operative Objective, ARUE-Project CMN [M2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we introduce a new method for the consolidation of ceramic artifacts using SiO2 and TiO2 nanopartides (NPs). We study the influence of NPs in the restoration process based on luminescence diagnostics and dating techniques. The nanopartides were grown by laser ablation in solution and their shape and dimensions were monitored by optical absorption and AFM morphology studies. The colloidal solutions are mainly made of spherical nanopartides with dimensions of about 10 and 15 nm following a LogNorm distribution with a standard deviation less than 1 nm. The colloidal solution was then deposed on pottery surfaces to obtain a transparent film with thickness of about I pm. All chemical and morphological analysis indicate that the NPs consolidate the artifact penetrating in the deeper surface layer and forming a transparent and hydrophobic film on the surface. The adsorption process is a typical physisorption mechanism without formation of chemical bonds between the NPs and the constitutive elements of ceramic and without introduction of external impurities, which can damage the materials. Finally, our results indicate a strong influence of NPs on the luminescence emission by the artifacts and then in the thermoluminescence dating process for restored ceramics. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available