4.6 Article

Development and validation of the Lymphedema Symptom and Intensity Survey-Arm

Journal

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 3103-3112

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2684-y

Keywords

Lymphedema; Instrument development; Symptoms; Distress; Intensity; Survey; Breast cancer

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society [MRSG-07-012-01-CPPB]
  2. Oncology Nursing Society Foundation
  3. National Center for Research Resources National Institutes of Health [UL 1RR024975]
  4. National Research Service Award [1 F31 NR07854-02]
  5. Sigma Theta Tau Iota Chapter grant
  6. Vanderbilt University Dissertation Enhancement Award
  7. Vanderbilt School of Nursing Postdoctoral Award
  8. Tactile Systems Technology, Incorporated, Tyler Street NE, Suite, Minneapolis, MN
  9. Martha Rivers Ingram Chair in Nursing at Vanderbilt University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this instrument development project was to create a self-report tool to evaluate arm lymphedema and associated symptoms in breast cancer survivors. The Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Arm (LSIDS-A) was developed and tested in three phases: phase 1-literature review and expert panel; phase 2-preliminary validation; and phase 3-final validation. Phase 1: The most common symptoms experienced by breast cancer survivors with lymphedema were identified. A 52-item scale was developed. Phase 2: 128 community-dwelling breast cancer survivors (64 with lymphedema, 64 without lymphedema) completed the LSIDS-A. Feedback from the participants was that the format was clear and made sense; therefore, the response structure was left intact. Sixteen items were deleted leaving a 36-item revised instrument. Phase 3: Subsequent testing in a total sample of 236 breast cancer survivors with lymphedema was undertaken. The Cronbach's alpha reliability values for the overall intensity and distress scores were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. The Kuder-Richardson values ranged from 0.66 to 0.92. Divergent validity evaluated against Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirebility Scale overall was acceptable (intensity, r (s) = 0.08; distress, r (s) = -0.12). Convergent validity was acceptable as tested with multiple instruments (e.g., Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast +4, overall intensity r (s) = -0.44, overall distress r (s) = -.48) The 30-item LSIDS-A is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to assess arm lymphedema and its associated symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available