4.4 Review

Glutamate and glutamine: a review of in vivo MRS in the human brain

Journal

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 1630-1646

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3045

Keywords

human; in vivo; glutamate; glutamine; MRS; C-13; one dimensional; two dimensional

Funding

  1. School of Health Sciences at the University of Newcastle
  2. Department of Defense Psychological Health/Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program of the Office of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs [W81XWH-10-1-0835]
  3. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS 078337]
  4. Center for Integration of Medicine (CIMIT) Innovation Grants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our understanding of the roles that the amino acids glutamate (Glu) and glutamine (Gln) play in the mammalian central nervous system has increased rapidly in recent times. Many conditions are known to exhibit a disturbance in Glu-Gln equilibrium, and the exact relationships between these changed conditions and these amino acids are not fully understood. This has led to increased interest in Glu/Gln quantitation in the human brain in an array of conditions (e.g. mental illness, tumor, neuro-degeneration) as well as in normal brain function. Accordingly, this review has been undertaken to describe the increasing number of in vivo techniques available to study Glu and Gln separately, or pooled as Glx'. The present MRS methods used to assess Glu and Gln vary in approach, complexity, and outcome, thus the focus of this review is on a description of MRS acquisition approaches, and an indication of relative utility of each technique rather than brain pathologies associated with Glu and/or Gln perturbation. Consequently, this review focuses particularly on (1) one-dimensional H-1 MRS, (2) two-dimensional H-1 MRS, and (3) one-dimensional C-13 MRS techniques. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available