4.4 Article

Tissue- and column-specific measurements from multi-parameter mapping of the human cervical spinal cord at 3 T

Journal

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 1823-1830

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3022

Keywords

spinal cord; magnetisation transfer; multi-parameter mapping; relaxometry

Funding

  1. UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre
  2. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  3. Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to quantify a range of MR parameters [apparent proton density, longitudinal relaxation time T-1, magnetisation transfer (MT) ratio, MT saturation (which represents the additional percentage MT saturation of the longitudinal magnetisation caused by a single MT pulse) and apparent transverse relaxation rate R-2*] in the white matter columns and grey matter of the healthy cervical spinal cord. The cervical cords of 13 healthy volunteers were scanned at 3 T using a protocol optimised for multi-parameter mapping. Intra-subject co-registration was performed using linear registration, and tissue- and column-specific parameter values were calculated. Cervical cord parameter values measured from levels C1-C5 in 13 subjects are: apparent proton density, 4822 +/- 718 a.u.; MT ratio, 40.4 +/- 1.53 p.u.; MT saturation, 1.40 +/- 0.12 p.u.; T-1=1848 +/- 143 ms; R-2*=22.6 +/- 1.53 s(-1). Inter-subject coefficients of variation were low in both the cervical cord and tissue- and column-specific measurements, illustrating the potential of this method for the investigation of changes in these parameters caused by pathology. In summary, an optimised cervical cord multi-parameter mapping protocol was developed, enabling tissue- and column-specific measurements to be made. This technique has the potential to provide insight into the pathological processes occurring in the cervical cord affected by neurological disorders. (c) 2013 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available