4.5 Article

An Internet Survey of Use, Opinions and Preferences for Smoking Cessation Medications: Nicotine, Varenicline, and Bupropion

Journal

NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 59-68

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts084

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We assessed use, compliance and preferences among smoking cessation medications in a real world sample of current and former smokers. Internet survey on a smoking cessation website (French/English, 2008-2010) to assess use of nicotine replacement therapies (NRT), varenicline, and bupropion. There were 885 participants (39% current smokers, 61% former smokers), the majority of the sample (70%) was female. The most frequently used medications were, in order: patches (40%), varenicline (23%), nicotine gum (16%), nicotine lozenge/tablet (10%), bupropion (8%), and inhaler (3%). Satisfaction, perceived relief of craving/withdrawal and effectiveness were best for varenicline and lowest for gum. In current users, duration of use was longest for gum (121 days), lozenge/tablet (152 days) and shortest for patch (25 days). Daily use was good for lozenge (9 pieces/day) but less than recommended for gum (6 pieces/day) and inhaler (2 plugs/day). People who tried more than 1 medication found varenicline more effective and satisfactory than NRT or bupropion; and users preferred patch to gum. By smoking status, former smokers had more education, reported greater use of medications (daily, over time) and reported more satisfaction with medications than current smokers. An Internet survey showed smoking cessation medications differed significantly in perceived effectiveness, satisfaction, and smoking status (former vs. current smoking). Except for lozenge/tablet, insufficient daily use remained a problem with acute NRTs. For all medications, improving outcome may require better instruction for proper use, approval of new indications (precessation) or development of new medications that bypass compliance issues that undermine success.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available