4.5 Article

Sex differences in long-term smoking cessation rates due to nicotine patch

Journal

NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 1245-1251

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1080/14622200802097506

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA084718] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [T32MH073451] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA012655] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA084718, P50 DA/CA84718] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA012655, DA12655] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [5T32MH073451-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared to men, women may be at greater risk for smoking-related diseases and have greater difficulty quitting smoking. Sex differences in medication response could guide treatment for smoking cessation to improve women's quit rates. We conducted a meta-analysis of the 14 placebo-controlled nicotine patch trials (N=6,250) for which long-term (6 months) clinical outcome results could be determined separately by sex. This analysis updated a meta-analysis of 11 of these trials that found no significant sex differences due to nicotine patch. The increase in quitting due to the nicotine vs. placebo patch was only about half as large in women as in men. Pooled absolute quit rates at 6 months for nicotine and placebo patch, respectively, were 20.1% and 10.8% in men, and 14.7% and 10.1% in women. The odds ratio for quitting due to nicotine vs. placebo patch was lower in women (OR=1.61) than in men (OR=2.20), with an interaction odds ratio of 1.40 (95% CI=1.02-1.93, p=.04). This sex difference did not vary significantly by whether or not formal counseling was provided. Poorer outcomes in women vs. men treated with nicotine patch suggests that increasing the quit rates of women smokers may require supplementing patch treatment or use of other medications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available