4.6 Review

On the minimum leaf conductance: its role in models of plant water use, and ecological and environmental controls

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 221, Issue 2, Pages 693-705

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15395

Keywords

cuticular conductance; drought tolerance; ecosystem modeling; plant water relations; stomatal conductance model

Categories

Funding

  1. ARC Linkage Project [LP140100232]
  2. Marie Curie fellowship [624473]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP140100232] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When the rate of photosynthesis is greatly diminished, such as during severe drought, extreme temperature or low light, it seems advantageous for plants to close stomata and completely halt water loss. However, water loss continues through the cuticle and incompletely closed stomata, together constituting the leaf minimum conductance (g(min)). In this review, we critically evaluate the sources of variation in g(min), quantitatively compare various methods for its estimation, and illustrate the role of g(min) in models of leaf gas exchange. A literature compilation of g(min) as measured by the weight loss of detached leaves is presented, which shows much variation in this trait, which is not clearly related to species groups, climate of origin or leaf type. Much evidence points to the idea that g(min) is highly responsive to the growing conditions of the plant, including soil water availability, temperature and air humidity - as we further demonstrate with two case studies. We pay special attention to the role of the minimum conductance in the Ball-Berry model of stomatal conductance, and caution against the usual regression-based method for its estimation. The synthesis presented here provides guidelines for the use of g(min) in ecosystem models, and points to clear research gaps for this drought tolerance trait.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available