4.6 Review

On the mechanisms of development in monocot and eudicot leaves

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 221, Issue 2, Pages 706-724

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15371

Keywords

development; dicot; eudicot; evo-devo; leaf; monocot

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology [1612235, 1710973]
  2. NSF IOS-PGRP [1238142]
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1710973, 1612235] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparisons of concepts in monocot and eudicot leaf development are presented, with attention to the morphologies and mechanisms separating these angiosperm lineages. Monocot and eudicot leaves are distinguished by the differential elaborations of upper and lower leaf zones, the formation of sheathing/nonsheathing leaf bases and vasculature patterning. We propose that monocot and eudicot leaves undergo expansion of mediolateral domains at different times in ontogeny, directly impacting features such as venation and leaf bases. Furthermore, lineage-specific mechanisms in compound leaf development are discussed. Although models for the homologies of enigmatic tissues, such as ligules and stipules, are proposed, tests of these hypotheses are rare. Likewise, comparisons of stomatal development are limited to Arabidopsis and a few grasses. Future studies may investigate correlations in the ontogenies of parallel venation and linear stomatal files in monocots, and the reticulate patterning of veins and dispersed stoma in eudicots. Although many fundamental mechanisms of leaf development are shared in eudicots and monocots, variations in the timing, degree and duration of these ontogenetic events may contribute to key differences in morphology. We anticipate that the incorporation of an ever-expanding number of sequenced genomes will enrich our understanding of the developmental mechanisms generating eudicot and monocot leaves.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available