4.6 Review

The unseen iceberg: plant roots in arctic tundra

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 205, Issue 1, Pages 34-58

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13003

Keywords

arctic; fine roots; model; plant-soil; root biomass; root production; root turnover; tundra

Categories

Funding

  1. Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the US Department of Energy Office of Science
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  3. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1107892] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant roots play a critical role in ecosystem function in arctic tundra, but root dynamics in these ecosystems are poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we synthesized available literature on tundra roots, including their distribution, dynamics and contribution to ecosystem carbon and nutrient fluxes, and highlighted key aspects of their representation in terrestrial biosphere models. Across all tundra ecosystems, belowground plant biomass exceeded aboveground biomass, with the exception of polar desert tundra. Roots were shallowly distributed in the thin layer of soil that thaws annually, and were often found in surface organic soil horizons. Root traits - including distribution, chemistry, anatomy and resource partitioning - play an important role in controlling plant species competition, and therefore ecosystem carbon and nutrient fluxes, under changing climatic conditions, but have only been quantified for a small fraction of tundra plants. Further, the annual production and mortality of fine roots are key components of ecosystem processes in tundra, but extant data are sparse. Tundra root traits and dynamics should be the focus of future research efforts. Better representation of the dynamics and characteristics of tundra roots will improve the utility of models for the evaluation of the responses of tundra ecosystems to changing environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available