4.6 Article

Comparison of phloem and xylem hydraulic architecture in Picea abies stems

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 205, Issue 1, Pages 102-115

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12973

Keywords

allometry; conductivity; conduit frequency; conduit tapering; conifers; phloem sieve cells; Picea abies; xylem tracheids

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [250299, 1268342]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [250299, 250299] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hydraulic properties of xylem and phloem differ but the magnitude and functional consequences of the differences are not well understood. Phloem and xylem functional areas, hydraulic conduit diameters and conduit frequency along the stems of Picea abies trees were measured and expressed as allometric functions of stem diameter and distance from stem apex. Conductivities of phloem and xylem were estimated from these scaling relations. Compared with xylem, phloem conduits were smaller and occupied a slightly larger fraction of conducting tissue area. Ten times more xylem than phloem was annually produced along the stem. Scaling of the conduit diameters and cross-sectional areas with stem diameter were very similar in phloem and xylem. Phloem and xylem conduits scaled also similarly with distance from stem apex; widening downwards from the tree top, and reaching a plateau near the base of the living crown. Phloem conductivity was estimated to scale similarly to the conductivity of the outermost xylem ring, with the ratio of phloem to xylem conductivity being c. 2%. However, xylem conductivity was estimated to increase more than phloem conductivity with increasing tree dimensions as a result of accumulation of xylem sapwood. Phloem partly compensated for its smaller conducting area and narrower conduits by having a slightly higher conduit frequency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available