4.6 Article

Root exudation of phytosiderophores from soil-grown wheat

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 203, Issue 4, Pages 1161-1174

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12868

Keywords

2 '-deoxymugineic acid (DMA); iron deficiency; phytosiderophore; rhizosphere; strategy II; trace elements; Triticum aestivum cv Tamaro

Categories

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P22798]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P22798] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 22798] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For the first time, phytosiderophore (PS) release of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv Tamaro) grown on a calcareous soil was repeatedly and nondestructively sampled using rhizoboxes combined with a recently developed root exudate collecting tool. As in nutrient solution culture, we observed a distinct diurnal release rhythm; however, the measured PS efflux was c. 50 times lower than PS exudation from the same cultivar grown in zero iron (Fe)-hydroponic culture. Phytosiderophore rhizosphere soil solution concentrations and PS release of the Tamaro cultivar were soil-dependent, suggesting complex interactions of soil characteristics (salinity, trace metal availability) and the physiological status of the plant and the related regulation (amount and timing) of PS release. Our results demonstrate that carbon and energy investment into Fe acquisition under natural growth conditions is significantly smaller than previously derived from zero Fe-hydroponic studies. Based on experimental data, we calculated that during the investigated period (2147 d after germination), PS release initially exceeded Fe plant uptake 10-fold, but significantly declined after c. 5 wk after germination. Phytosiderophore exudation observed under natural growth conditions is a prerequisite for a more accurate and realistic assessment of Fe mobilization processes in the rhizosphere using both experimental and modeling approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available