4.6 Article

Maintaining distances with the engineer: patterns of coexistence in plant communities beyond the patch-bare dichotomy

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 204, Issue 1, Pages 140-148

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12899

Keywords

coexistence; engineer; interactions; Mediterranean high mountain; nearest-neighbor analysis; point-raster approach; Ripley's K-function; spatial heterogeneity

Categories

Funding

  1. Comunidad de Madrid [CM-S2009/AMB-1783]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CGL2012-38427, CGL2009-13190-C03-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-phase plant communities with an engineer conforming conspicuous patches and affecting the performance and patterns of coexisting species are the norm under stressful conditions. To unveil the mechanisms governing coexistence in these communities at multiple spatial scales, we have developed a new point-raster approach of spatial pattern analysis, which was applied to a Mediterranean high mountain grassland to show how Festuca curvifolia patches affect the local distribution of coexisting species. We recorded 22 111 individuals of 17 plant perennial species. Most coexisting species were negatively associated with F. curvifolia clumps. Nevertheless, bivariate nearest-neighbor analyses revealed that the majority of coexisting species were confined at relatively short distances from F. curvifolia borders (between 0-2 cm and up to 8 cm in some cases). Our study suggests the existence of a fine-scale effect of F. curvifolia for most species promoting coexistence through a mechanism we call 'facilitation in the halo'. Most coexisting species are displaced to an interphase area between patches, where two opposite forces reach equilibrium: attenuated severe conditions by proximity to the F. curvifolia canopy (nutrient-rich islands) and competitive exclusion mitigated by avoiding direct contact with F. curvifolia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available